Law centre roof appeal (360G-HeartofEnglandCF-A473341)

A project to support the replacement of the roof at Birmingham Community Law Centre

Where is this data from?

This data was originally published by Heart of England Community Foundation. If you see something about your organisation or the funding it has received on this page that doesn't look right you can submit a grantee amendment request. You can hover over codes from standard codelists to see the user-friendly name provided by 360Giving.

Grant Details

Amount Applied For 1000
Amount Awarded 1000
Award Date 2018-02-22T00:00:00+00:00
Beneficiary Location: Country Code GB
Beneficiary Location: Geographic Code E01009371
Beneficiary Location: Geographic Code Type LSOA
Beneficiary Location: Name Birmingham 077D
Grant Programme: Code March 2018
Grant Programme: Title Harry Payne Fund
Impact Category Maximise ability to strengthen community cohesion and build social capacity
Last Modified 2018-03-19T00:00:00+00:00
Planned Dates: End Date 2017-04-30T00:00:00+00:00
Planned Dates: Start Date 2017-11-13T00:00:00+00:00
Primary age group All Ages
Primary beneficiary People living in poverty
Primary ethnicity Bangladeshi
Primary issue Refugees/Asylum/Immigration
Recipient Org: Charity Number 1087312
Recipient Org: Description BCLC is a not-for-profit, solicitor- led legal advice agency able to provide holistic services to the most vulnerable and excluded people in our community. We deal with the law that affects everyday life. We offer specialist expertise in migrants’ rights through a city wide network of organisations within which we have built a strong reputation for undertaking complex and challenging casework in: • Migrants rights – access to asylum support, Children Act and Care Act support, impact of immigration status on benefits entitlement; • Immigration advice - one off advice and casework on a range of immigration issues; • Community Care – Children Act and Care Act support for those with NRPF; • Public law challenges, judicial review; • Welfare Benefits Upper Tribunal challenges